Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/58516
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPenner, James-
dc.contributor.editorJAMES PENNER-
dc.contributor.editorHENRY E. SMITH-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-27T09:00:55Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-27T09:00:55Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.isbn978–0–19–967358–2-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/58516-
dc.descriptionIn 1992, in an article tellingly entitled ‘Too Much Property’, 1 Lawrence Becker told us that one of the things which property theorists might now avoid recapitulating at any great length was the ‘now-standard conceptual apparatus of property theory: Hohfeld’s analysis of rights, Honoré’s analysis of ownership, and typologies of justificatory argumentsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Press,Inc.,en_US
dc.subjectPhilosophicalen_US
dc.titlePhilosophical Foundationsof Property Lawen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Education Planning & Management(EDPM)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
20.pdf1.84 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.